Parity and Representation of Queer Characters in the Entertainment Industry

Anyone who’s watched TV, movies and/or plays/musicals and paid attention knows there’s an issue with parity in entertainment, especially when looking at how many LGBTQ and female characters exist in leading roles. That’s not really the worst part of the situation though; what’s more troubling than the lack of leading roles is how these two groups are portrayed. Often women are portrayed as submissive and, if they ARE a strong lead, most often they are portrayed in a way that makes them seem…well…like total bitches (though it is definitely improving lately).

It’s worse for those in the LGBTQ group. Too often we are viewed as stereotypes–men dressed in “womens” clothes, flamboyant gay men–and as comic relief, as comedic tropes. Rare glimpses are still the normal, however. As things are improving for representation and diversity in Hollywood, too often the standard tropes and stereotypes continue to be used, because they are easy to use.

Admittedly, queer people like me are–FINALLY!–starting to be recognized. Transgender actors are hitting the mainstream. Pose, Transparent. These are the shows we need in order to boost our profiles. Some TV shows and movies have had prominent Trans/GNC (T/GNC) characters, Orange is the New Black is one such show. The Conners has a gender nonconforming character too. The character, a young boy, wears a dress and likes boys. In this case, the gender nonconforming character is a child, and my guess is that the writers will have them “grow out of that phase” rather than embracing the beauty of being ones self. This is the predicament we face in the LGBTQ community when it comes to parity, to adequate and proper representation on TV, in movies and on stage.

Then there are those working on increasing queer visibility. Pooya Mohseni is fundraising for her Transit: A New York City Fairy Tale. Gabriel Furman and and his crew are shopping around a gem of a show about a GNC child; it’s titled Wonder. Neil Patrick Harris did Hedwig and the Angry Inch.

All this is an uphill battle. As you might have gathered, there is a profound lack of Trans/GNC characters on Broadway. While shows like Southern Comfort, Red Emma and the Mad Monk, Hedwig and the Angry Inch and a few others all have a focused main character who’s T/GNC, these aren’t Broadway. They are off-off- and off-Broadway. Granted, Hedwig made it to Broadway briefly…but it took 16 years to do that. It opened on off-Broadway in 1998, and was revolutionary. It didn’t parody the T/GNC community; it showed them (us) as persons dealing with unique issues. It was revived in 2014 on Broadway. During its run, it won and was nominated for several awards…yet, it was the last high profile play or musical featuring a T/GNC character.

But the times do seem to be changing. There is an increase in movement towards and desire to bring more T/GNC voices and characters to the stage and film.

So that’s good.

But we need more. Thankfully there are advocates like Pooya, Parity Productions, Shakina Nayfack and a growing cast of other diversity advocates in show business who are pushing for equity and parity within the entertainment industry.

I hope we will soon see an exponential increase in work that tells our stories.

If you’re a manager, producer, agent or director interested in reading my work with primary LGBTQ, specifically T/GNC, characters, drop me an email at mygerlparts@gmail.com. We’ll talk. 🙂

Becoming a Queer Playwright: Why I Moved to Stage Writing from TV & Film Writing

Becoming a Queer Playwright

My earliest memories of loving film and TV and stage plays and radio dramas—liking melodrama to be more precise—was racing home after elementary school to turn on the radio and trying to get a clear signal for “The Shadow”. The Shadow knows what evil lies in the heart of men. It’s part of the reason I went back to my roots, my primary love, and switched to writing stage plays rather than TV shows and films.

I loved it because I could create the scene in my head. I created a play, a movie, a TV show as I saw it, not as someone else told me it was.

That’s the greatest issue I have with TV and movies. Things aren’t that well presented as pieces of creative thought. That is, characters aren’t always correct, portrayed properly. They get the wrong actor or actress, the wrong something, they change key aspects of a story. Like casting ScarJo as a transman…as if that’s believable in any way.

In other words, they fiddle with everything and have so many hands in the work that things get mucked up. Consistency is lost.

I know a film writer who got called to work five days on a movie. She wrote three jokes. All but one was then cut from the film because the star didn’t like them after the director put them in. The director had another character deliver them instead and still two got cut and the one left in didn’t make sense because the wrong character was delivering it. Five days to write three jokes to be delivered by the wrong character and two being cut. Seems like a waste of time and effort, doesn’t it?

New Sight

But in a play. In a play, it was what I saw and see in my mind. It’s as though the playwright always knows what’s in my head. When I see Belle or The Phantom or any number of other characters in plays, I’m not surprised and left scratching my head as to why the hell the Hunchback of Notre Dame isn’t a hunchback at all. Or why Miss Saigon isn’t set in the right place or why a sniper keeps missing an easy shot on the bad guy (because the show/film needs to keep the bad guy alive for the time being usually). I don’t have to worry about watching the story fall apart as it goes on because of some editing snafu or some writer decided not to read the backstory of a character and had them say or do something out of character.

In a stage play (and on radio), every character, every location, every word is perfect. Nothing is out of place because nothing can be out of place.

It’s perfection. Sure, some stories are more engaging than others, but there’s never a loss of continuity in plays.

An Unfair Comparison?

Some readers will say, “That’s an unfair comparison. Plays aren’t serialized.” To those I say, “Neither are movies, and yet…” movies are made that jump all over with no rhyme nor reason or have an ending that just doesn’t seem to fit. Netflix made “This Is The End”…problem is, there was no end. We’ve no idea if the world ended or not and how it did and so on.

Plays suck you into them. They are personal. And that’s why they are so popular. It’s really the spectacle of it all.

While movies…let me stick with that comparison since movies are in a similar vein as stage plays than are radio and TV…While movies are going for the big money—millions of dollars can be had with the right one—plays aren’t primarily concerned with the money. That’s certainly a top goal, as is making the play run for as long as possible (30 years maybe!) but it’s not the primarily reason. The main reason is to entertain, then to teach. They are all social commentary in some way. From Thoroughly Modern Millie to Cats to Hamilton to Wicked and Phantom, there are no plays that don’t shine a light on some aspect of our culture. They are intelligent in how they lambaste cultural conceptions. You don’t get that brilliance with movies.

Plays have to engage. They’ve no choice. People can wait until a bad movie gets to Netflix or Amazon or hulu. The movie, regardless of how horrible it is, will get played. But a play is do or die. If it’s not good, it’s dead. It’s gone.

There are no edits to make it look better than it really is either. A play stands on its own. The actors, playwright, director, crew and anyone else connected to the production must be at their best at all times. There’s no cut, no editing, no splicing. It’s the group of actors on that stage night in and day out, not for a series of filming days where errors can be easily edited out.

A forgotten line on stage spells disaster. A forgotten line in filming is a re-do until it’s done correctly.

Becoming a Playwright: Agency, Inclusion, Diversity & Queerness

While I enjoy writing TV shows and gradually fiddling with movie script writing, my heart is in stage plays.

Why? That’s not where the money is.

Life’s not about money. It sure as hell helps, but my work is too niche for TV. But it’s perfect for Broadway, Off-Broadway and Off-Off-Broadway. On these stages, queerness is explored freely. It’s not hindered. It’s not glossed over. It’s not a punchline. A queer character is always integral to any play with one in it. The character is given agency unto itself.

In movies, we see all the stereotypes play out. On stage, we see it every now and again, but as a general rule, queers are viewed as just another person, another character. They serve a purpose to advance the narrative, push forward the plot.

Hollywood fights inclusion a great deal. Broadway thrives on inclusion, on diversity. Sure, Broadway isn’t as diverse as one might hope, but it’s always been more diverse than it’s Hollywood sibling for decades; just look at the diversity numbers for each: Broadway diversity versus Hollywood diversity.

Broadway demolishes Hollywood in the diversity of topics too. Minority, queer, gender…all of these are openly addressed in stage plays.

When you hear the protests about trans actors, about LGBTQ representation, about minority representation in films, well, that’s Hollywood. Not Broadway. I’ve seen many, many, many calls for auditions for plays that specifically call for queer actors to fill a queer character. I’ve been told many times about how a minority had been cast simply because they were the best for the job. Does it really matter if Rum Tum Tugger is played by a white woman or a black man? Not at all. Can the Phantom be an African American? Absolutely! In fact, he has been on stage a few times!

This dedication to diversity on stage is what draws me the most. It’s where I feel most comfortable.

After all, the play is the thing.